When?

Washington D.C. is a funny place where things are usually what they seem, but those who live and move and breathe in it’s rarefied air only occasionally acknowledge things as they are. That leaves most of us publicly and/or privately scratching our heads, wondering whether reality is unwinding (ahem) or those we cast our votes for are liars or just naive.

 

I have been lately thinking about the countless millions who must be walking around confused, thoughts spinning, scratching heads over what is shaping up to be more of the same from the candidate of change living behind the hallowed White Walls at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Just like those two men, walking to Emmaus post-crucifixion, you can actually hear dreams deflating at the Huffington Post and Daily Kos (not so much at the Kos)… “we had hoped that he was the one who would redeem… “ 

In reality, what we’ve seen splashed across the daily news every day so far is simply the implications of electing a flashy, brash, unproven charismatic personality. Atleast three of his appointments are tax frauds (Timothy Geithner skated through to be Treasury Secretary, Tom Daschle & Nancy Killefer withdrew as Secy of Health & Human Services and Chief Performance Czar respectively). He promised to not appoint lobbyists to his White House, and so far he’s only appointed 17. He’s castigated the American people for their carbon footprint, all the while keeping the White House heat cranked up. He asks us to tighten our belt and serves $100/pound beef.

There are definitely a couple of talking points here that are really, really significant:

 

  1. What you’ve done matters: Obama won the rhetoric battle this past campaign season. Unfortunately, his rhetoric didn’t match his record. He made our hearts flutter and Chris Matthews legs tingle, but whether it’s because of the media or because of the masses didn’t clamor for it, what Barack Obama had actually done was never allowed to become an issue. Obama’s never been anything but a rabid, leftist partisan. His record in the Illinois Senate shows that, and his microscopically short tenure in the U.S. Senate only reveals that he’d been running for President since day one, so he steered clear (Present) of any actual votes. President Obama is exactly what he’s always been. A radical Democrat.  
  2. Truly left-leaning Democrats are elitists: By that, I mean there is an intrisic belief that they are better than (or at very least smarter than) the rest of us in most ways, so they don’t actually have to play by all the rules that we have to. The Speaker of the House doesn’t feel the need to get involved in the Pop Culture she was elected to represent. The man who will run the Treasury can’t be expected to pay his taxes, neither can the appointed Secretary of Health & Human Services and other high ranking officials. The God of Green, Al Gore thinks nothing of fanning the flames of fear & frenzy over global warming while racking up a $30,000 utility bill. John Edward’s briefly ran for President to dismantle the two America’s dichotomy from the comfort of his  30,000 square foot estate. They tell you what they want you to hear, whether or not it’s true, or whether or not they actually believe it themselves.
  3. The Ends don’t always justify the means - Elections make people say crazy things. They have a tendency to draw out inflated claims of power and potential. It seems to be a unique belief on the left that whatever needs to be said to gain power is acceptable. This goes back to the elitism above. They are so convinced that they know something we don’t, so convinced that they hold they keys of knowledge and understanding that the only hope we as a uinverse have is to get them elected. So if they have to stretch truth or appoint “indispensable” tax cheats to head the Treasury after promising reform in Washington, it makes little difference. What matters is that “The One” is in office.
  4. Principles matter: Precisely because of all these things, principled leadership is crucial. Well established principles do the right thing, even if it’s not politically expedient. Principled leadership is what drove President Bush to leave office as possibly the most unpopular President in history. I disagree with many of the decisions that he made (especially at the end), but to look back, he did exactly what he said he was going to do to the best of his ability. He was guided by his principles. So far, it seems President Obama is being guided by his lack of them.  
Our responsibility on the right is to not let it happen. Talk to people you know about it. The tone of our discourse should be all together different from the whining and whimpering of the past 8 years. It should, however be pointed, direct, and laden with facts.
The citizens of the United States elected what we hoped would be the candidate of hope and change, two ideas that apparently struck a chord with the masses. What we have been dealt so far is heaping helpings of the same old thing. It’s imperative that we go forward, because right now hope can rise again. 2010 is around the corner, and there is a lot of work to do getting the right people in place to stem the tide of Obamalitics. So get involved. Learn the names of the players on the state and national scene. Have a conversation with your friends, especially the ones who voted for King Barry the Hopeful. Ask them if they are satisfied with what their President is doing. Ask them why.
Most of all, don’t lose hope, trust that your voice matters, and hold your leaders accountable to principled leadership.
6 COMMENTS
D Banks
February 9, 2009
ad

“I have been lately thinking about the countless millions who must be walking around confused, thoughts spinning, scratching heads over what is shaping up to be more of the same from the candidate of change living behind the hallowed White Walls at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.”

Appreciate the concern, but we’re doing great. Pretty happy so far, we’ll letcha know.

February 9, 2009
ad

Are you doing great because you approve of the lack of change, or because it doesn’t really matter what was said before, as long as our guy got the job?

D Banks
February 10, 2009
ad

I assume by “lack of change” you mean more change than any President in american history.

He’s appointed his biggest political rival and three republicans to his cabinet

imposed the strictest restrictions on lobbyists in history forcing all members of the administration to recuse themselves from issues they’ve lobbied on in the past and imposing the rule that any member of his administration can’t lobby the administration for 2 years after they leave

signed an executive order to finally enforce the fair pay act.

signed and executive order to close guantanamo- the symbol of our departure as the moral leader of the world

proposed the largest stimulous package in history

signed an executive order shifting the burden of proof to the governemnt in freedom of information act matters

placed restrictions on executive pay and bonuses for companies recieving TARP money

So I agree, he could of done a little more, but making more fundamental changes in his first month than anyone in history will have to be enough for now. Don’t worry,. more is coming. I don’t want you to be dissappointed. Wait till he askes everyone to pay Social Security Taxes… that should be a barnburner.

February 11, 2009
ad

Seriously? Why is appointing your biggest rival something to laud? If he were serious about change and wanting the best person, he would have appointed her husband. It’s only good luck that it didn’t happen.

As far as the restrictions for lobbyists, that makes exactly the point I’m talking about. It’s all rhetoric. Just like the President, it’s empty. He made the restrictions, then went and hired no less than 17 lobbyists. Now the Daschle was officially ousted, he’s… LOBBYING and it’s funny how many of his ideas ended up in our stimu-less package.

He closed Guantanamo which is an absolutely symbolic act that has left him hamstrung as to what to do with the prisoners. You say it indicates our departure as the moral leaders of the world, I say it’s symbolic of the pledge to provide for the common defense. Not only that, but where do you think they’ll end up. Not here, but back in countries where they will either 1) be tortured, or 2) slip back into their old ways. By the way, show me a country in the world more committed to life? Show me a country in the history of the universe that takes the dead and wounded off the battlefield? You’ll have a hard time convincing anyone that because the US waterboards people who rape men to shame them into becoming suicide bombers, we are no longer the moral leaders of the world. That’s just short sided. Who is the moral standard, now? The French? The British? It’s easy to be morally judgmental and superior when you’re weak.

Restrictions on executive pay for TARP companies is exactly the wrong move, and it’s absolutely symbolic. First of all, it’s not retroactive, so anyone who has already received it isn’t applicable. Second, by limiting executive pay, you’re keeping the best and brightest from engaging in those problems. I want the smartest people in those positions, but if they can only make $500,000 at B.O.A. and $26M at some European conglomerate, where do you think they’ll go? How does that help the economy? It’s a bad symbolic gesture that doesn’t make things better, and actually makes things worse.

I don’t think he’s made a single fundamental change. I think he’s walked the democratic fiscal line, and he’s made made the same empty liberal executive orders that we would expect.

Status quo – 100. Change – 0

ad

[...] closely by the Tax Cheating cabinet debacle. Then we had President Obama reneging on his promise not to appoint lobbyists. Then there was the whole Porkulus fiasco followed immediately by President Obama promising to [...]

ad

[...] closely by the Tax Cheating cabinet debacle. Then we had President Obama reneging on his promise not to appoint lobbyists. Then there was the whole Porkulus fiasco followed immediately by President Obama promising to cut [...]

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.