It didn’t have to be this way. If liberals in congress and the media had only acted like grown ups instead of losing their minds about “torture”, we could have avoided this whole messy thing. Instead, as soon as they took power they started calling for President Bush’s head on a platter over the torture issue. With no small amount of moral superiority I heard, time and again, how the Democrats allowed us to be proud to be American’s, and proud of our President again. Taking on the tenor of a moral crusade, torture became the cause du jour for those perched on the left.

It seemed that the torture issue was a picture of everything that was wrong with the Bush administration: he was mean, hateful, self-interested,dumb, and unenlightened. The cry went out for America to return to the place of moral leadership in the world again. Thank God that the Democrats, those watchdogs of civil liberties, were once again at the helm. Certainly if they had known about something so ugly as TORTURE, they would have vociferously objected. 

As of May 9, the Times Online reported that Nancy Pelosi, then House Minority Leader denied being briefed on torture, saying,

Nancy Pelosi is still insisting that she knew nothing about the CIA’s use of waterboarding, despite the release of intelligence documents showing that she had been briefed by the Bush Administration on details of its harsh interrogation programme. 

Torture is a brutal, sub-human practice and if it had gone on, surely the Speaker of the House would have stood up and decried the practice. The Wall Street Journal on April 22, 2009 reported on Pelosi’s desire for a “Truth Commission to investigate the interrogation of terror suspects during the Bush administration.” As it turns out, she could have just browsed the notes from her briefing on September 4, 2002.

What to do now? The left has taken a very public and outspoken stance against what they call torture, and what others are calling “Enhanced Interrogation Techniques” or “EIT’s”. Setting aside the fact that the techniques worked, we’re still faced with the situation of what to do now that Speaker Pelosi was clearly briefed on enhanced interrogation techniques which places here diametrically in opposition to where her very own party has placed themselves. 

Well, Chuck Schumer (D-NY) who said in 2004,  ”I think there are very few people… in America who would say that torture should never ever be used, particularly if thousands of lives are at stake.” That doesn’t sound like the current line from the left. 

Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) seemed to backtrack when she said, “I think it’s a tempest in a teapot really to say: Well, Speaker Pelosi should have known all of this, she should have stopped this, she should have done this or done that,I don’t want to make an apology for anybody, but in 2002, it wasn’t 2006, 07, 08 or 09. It was right after 9/11, and there were in fact discussions about a second wave of attacks.” That’s pretty much the point that we’ve been making all along. Now that Speaker Pelosi is implicated, that argument carries weight with the left.

Nancy Pelosi’s argument has been decidedly less nuanced, if not more difficult to follow & pin down. Glenn Thrush reported at Politico on May 8 that Pelosi admitted she was breifed, but not about Waterboarding. Then she went one step further and claimed that the CIA misled her. It’s still no fault of hers, however. That should be clearly stipulated.

At this point in the dog-and-pony show, I’m not surprised at the mid course rhetoric correction and passing of the buck. It’s become a party wide mantra. Before every press conference or any news that could slightly be tinged negative, we’re reminded that the problem was inherited from the Bush administration. There’s no personal responsibility whatsoever. Pelosi lies, repeatedly, on camera, and doesn’t think twice about it. She stammers like the chess team captain proposing to the prom queen, but she pins it on someone else.

Interestingly enough, that seems to be the underlying policy principle on the left. If you are poor, it’s not your fault, it’s because Warren Buffet makes too much money. If you kill five fellow soldiers in Iraq, it’s because the military is hard on people. If you can’t pay for yourself, someone else should be made to pay for you. It’s a life philosophy that doesn’t work. If you do not take responsibility for your self, someone else can not be made to take responsibility for you.

This is also the danger in big government programs, from a nationalized government health care option, to a nationalized banking industry, to Government Motors and her soon to be associates. Government officials are people, as prone to and likely to abuse their power as any. This is not exclusively a problem on the left. The right would get us into the same issues, it just seems that those on the right are more aware of their propensity, so they hold to a small government philosophy. The problem with government isn’t in the theoretical. It’s in the practical. On paper, communism is a beautiful system, ensuring that everyone receives equally. The unfortunate reality is that there are no perfect people to administer such a system. Nancy Pelosi lies to us, on television, without batting an eye. What makes anyone think she would be more honest or forthright when it comes to administering any government program? 

Nancy Pelosi’s recent problems illustrate the reason that government isn’t the solution to our problems, government is the problem. At play in every step and decision on this way was gaining or keeping political power. When she was briefed in 2002, she was interested in preserving power for herself (and protecting the United States, undoubtedly). When she stood with Democrats against President Bush on torture, there were political implications. When she blames the CIA, she is undoubtedly trying to position for political power. Who can fault her? She’s in a powerful position, and she likes it. Anyone would. There are benefits to a system like that. At the end of the day, however, they are just not ultimately beneficial for the general population of Americans.  

So here’s to Pelosi’s call for a Truth Commission. I just wonder if she’ll be one of the ones being investigated.

UPDATE: Once Pelosi realized that it’s not good to blame the organization that specializes in crashing foreign governments that oppose them, she backtracks and… wait for it… blames Bush, while simultaneously sucking up to Panetta. This lady is a professional!

UPDATE part deux: thanks to Joel Runyon for the tip to Stewart’s treatment of Pelosi. I’m not presenting this as hard core journalism, just enjoying the humor of it.

11 COMMENTS
Joel Runyon
May 15, 2009
ad

I know you’re not a big Jon Stewart fan, but he gets her pretty good here =)

See, sometimes he can be even-sided =)

dbanks
May 15, 2009
ad

“Nancy Pelosi lies to us, on television, without batting an eye.”

In fairness, I don’t think she could bat her eyes if she wanted too.

May 16, 2009
ad

HA! You know, I never considered that! Her face has been stretched so many times, when she tries to bat her eyes her ears twitch.

That was rude on my part, and not in the tone of civil discourse.

Kristen
May 18, 2009
ad

A couple of things- don’t confuse the left with the democrats. All the left leaning people I know were mad as hell that the democrats weren’t demonstrating any political courage during the run-up to the Iraq War, or on the torture issue. And every left leaning person I know is glad that Pelosi is being called out. Let this be a lesson to all politicians that they will pay politically for their cowardice.

On another note- if government is the problem, why not get rid of it all together? Every man for himself?

dbanks
May 21, 2009
ad

What’s funny about this whole thing is that I would say the same thing she has.
It came out in 02ish that the bush admin was looking into the legality of these things and then during Alberto Gonzalez confirmations hearing there was much talk of the discussion of torture and that the Bushies had done plenty of investigation into these tactics, but then the tone changed and Bush continually said “we dont torture” “we dont torture” and everyone kinda put it away. I would have guessed we slapped some folks around a little but it seemed at the time waterboarding was the big issue and something we had considered torture before but it sure felt like they were trying to make it clear we don’t do stuff like that. Then it comes out that we did the whole time.
So strangely enough (and remember I cant stand that lady…) When Pelosi says she was told about the possible techniques and that discussions were underway about the legality of them but was never told they were being used and in fact was led to believe that they weren’t… I believe her because that would be the exact story of the american people as well.

Kristen
May 22, 2009
ad

I can’t believe you’re actually making me attack your support for Pelosi, but here goes. What we see with Pelosi is what we see with most politicians (and people in general for that matter). She didn’t inquire or challenge enough. If she genuinely didn’t think the CIA was engaging these tactics, then I’d say she was dangerously naive and failed in her role to challenge government officials for even considering torture. But maybe she just didn’t want to know, and that’s why she didn’t push the subject. In that case, I’d say she was dangerously coniving and/or cowardly in the face of challenging a popular president. Either way, she was derelict in her duty to the American people.

David Banks
May 30, 2009
ad

Im just posting a comment here so that I will have all the slots on the “recent comment” list but….
Its just not Pelosi’s job to fight that battle (and remember I cant stand that lady) but these people didn’t become successful politicians by gathering their armies and charging every hill. Sure.. as the firey lefty scrapper you are you want them to just scream the message from the hilltops every day, but there is such a thing a conserving political capital. (especially when your knowledge of something comes from a classified briefing)
Let me also remind everyone that I cant stand that lady.

Kristen
June 2, 2009
ad

When politicians choose to conserve political capital at the expense of their oath to uphold the constitution, then they shouldn’t start pointing fingers at others. If they do,we have to call them out.

David Banks
June 2, 2009
ad

Where did she violate her oath to uphold the constitution?

Kristen
June 3, 2009
ad

The 8th amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. I’m gonna say torture qualifies as cruel and unusual. If Pelosi knew a violation of the 8th amendment did occur or was likely to occur, she’s got an obligation to speak up because, as a senator, she swore an oath to uphold the U.S. constitution.

David Banks
June 3, 2009
ad

Seriously, how did it end up that I’m defending this crazy lady? The detainees do not have the rights granted by the constitution. Cruel and Unusual is for convicted criminals and does not speak to the treatment of those in custody. The torture violates a variety of international treaties but I just don’t see a proactive responsibility for the Speaker to expose a gray area CIA practice that she learned about in a classified briefing.

Post a comment